Beyond Leinberger-Transit in Post Suburban America

In The Atlantic, Chris Leinberger makes a compelling argument for developer produced transit as a means of solving some of the neighborhood and transit problems American cities are currently experiencing.  Last winter, in person, in a lunch-hour talk to the College of Built Environments at the University of Washington, he made the same argument even more compelling.  The logic is so simple, how could it possibly be wrong?

The urban fabric of early 19th century American cities resulted partly from patterns established by developers.   Transit systems to ‘outlying’ areas were built by developers who wanted to sell land and houses in areas where access was not otherwise practical. Sadly, those systems were dismantled as the transportation focus in America shifted to automobile based systems. The overcrowded road network that many Americans spend multiple hours per day negotiating are becoming less and less viable. And the public delivery model of mass urban transit is timeconsuming and extremely expensive.

Leinberger’s assertion that the old developer-led transit model should be re-deployed today is compelling, but we need more details.  Looking at the two primary conditions that made it work in the early 19th century is instructive:  cheap, undeveloped land and inadequate transportation.  Our urban areas today suffer due to their enormous size and the pressure that size places on our transportation networks.  Cheap, undeveloped land today is so far from the urban center that it cannot be part of any solution.  And while we have inadequate transportation, it’s not yet inadequate enough.  Too many still people prefer to spend time alone in their cars rather than take public transit.

Still, Leinberger’s idea is not something we should should simply toss aside.  It needs to be further developed.  For instance, serious consideration should to be given to the specific circumstances where a developer driven transit system would be possible. Somehow, the economic benefits of the real estate development, or re-development, need to be great enough to cover the expense of the transit system.  And maybe that means a different form of transit system.

What would happen if developers went into pedestrian-unfriendly areas, altered the fabric somehow to make them pedestrian friendly, and then provided a less expensive link from the redevelped  area to a publicly funded transit system? 

Leinberger doesn’t have an implementable idea, but he might have a good idea.  It just needs to be developed.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by briandneville. Bookmark the permalink.

About briandneville

Brian Neville will be completing a Master of Science in Real Estate degree in June, 2012 at the University of Washington. Mr. Neville works part-time as a development consultant to Steve Orser at Wood Partners, Pacific Northwest, performing due diligence, entitlement, market analysis, and deal sourcing for large multifamily developments in the Puget Sound area. He has also served as a consultant with Meriwether Partners in Seattle where his experience as an architect and general contractor have been valuable resources. Mr. Neville is a licensed architect in the state of Washington, where he founded and operated a design-build firm in Seattle between1998 and 2010. Examples of Mr. Neville’s work from this time can be seen at vanzandtdesignbuild.com. Between 1995 and 1998, Mr. Neville worked in architecture as a project manager with Environmental Works in Seattle, focusing on mid-sized commercial buildings, social service facilities, and low income and special needs housing. Originally from Denver, Mr. Neville holds a MARCH from the University of Washington and a BA from Middlebury College. He currently lives on north capitol hill with his wife and two children. He is active in the Seattle Public Schools community and in youth sports where he has coached soccer, baseball, and basketball. He is an active NAIOP member, where he currently serves on the membership committee. Mr. Neville is also a member of the Urban Land Institute. In his spare time, Mr. Neville is an avid mountain biker, a recovering free-heel skier, and endlessly injured no-longer-competitive soccer player.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s