TOD isn’t Convenient, Until It Is

“No matter the cost of gas we need to get to work and each minute shaved off the commute is a minute-golden and fat and glowing- added to our real lives, the life that begins after work, at home, in the bars and restaurants, with the children and the bills and the dog.” T. C. Boyle, The New York Times.

My ideal self-narrative goes like this:  I am a huge proponent of Transit Oriented Development. I bought my house on the Sound Transit Link Light Rail line because I won’t drive my car.  I live in a community with coffee shops, small boutiques, restaurants, bars, a farmers market and a butcher. My kid’s school and extra-curricular activities are located within my “walk-shed.”

My real-life narrative goes like this:  I am a huge proponent of Transited oriented development (darn, that biker keeps making me pass him!  He should just let me go first because I’m just going to pass him again when this light turns green!) I intentionally live close to the Link Light Rail because I (would totally) take the train to school (if I didn’t have to rush straight from school to hot yoga, if I am going to get a workout in today, because I have to take Mychal to her tap class.)  Her class is an hour long and I chose this studio because it is near the house and we can ride bikes or walk there (score!) except I will need at least 30 minutes to ride my bike, and I only will have 15 minutes to get there.   (Plus I can go to the grocery store, which is only a 5 minute car ride away from the studio, and shop for my family of 5 and be back before her class ends.) It’s off to work and I will take the light-Rail because it goes right to the airport! (But then I will have to leave an hour earlier and I need that hour.) The train is cheaper (ooh except it isn’t free and $2.50 is more than the gas I already paid for. I have to get an Orca Card soon.) It’s faster, though… (except  it is not faster because my walk to the train is about 15 minutes and another 15 minute walk to the terminal, in addition to waiting for the train and the 10 minute train ride.)

In the end, I somehow convince myself that my ideal self-narrative is my real self-narrative.  Guilty as charged.  I drive every day and yet I still hear myself saying “yes, I live right by the train, it is so convenient.”  Here is the reality; the small family-owned vintage theater in my neighborhood closed after years of financial struggle.  I loved that theater because I went there all the time (No, I didn’t.)  No, that’s more of my self-narration; I didn’t because giving the choice, the theater that was a 15 minute drive from my house with a huge parking lot was more convenient than a theater that is a 10 minute walk.  Why , because it’s cold? Raining? I have a tight schedule? The kids? Yes! Yes! Yes! And Yes!  The crux of the issue is: Choice and Convenience.

The modern family, not to mention the modern commuter, isn’t rooted to one spot.  “We live a life in wide and complicated orbits that take in the whole sprawling metro region and we’ve got technologies (such as cell phones) that encourage movement without loss of productivity.”

Technology offers efficiency of whatever the technological advance’s purpose is.  For example the technical advance of social media is the democracy of information and disseminates it with speed and efficiency.  While technology makes for more efficient economies, it creates the expectation of immediate production.  The car, like the cellphone, email or the airplane, is an example of a technology that created efficiency in travel and expanded our choice.  The rise in efficiency created by technological advancement leads to a rise in expectations further enhancing auto dependency.   Would it be unreasonable for you to tell your boss that “the memo is on the way, I mailed it a couple days ago it should be there any day now” or “Just boarding the train, see you in a week and a half”?  Time is a precious commodity of modern life and monetary deterrents such as raising gas prices and taxes may not be enough to offset time.

Unfortunately New York City is not a good model for its high use of public transit because of the unique transportation history and when their public transportation system was developed and the cities density which is a major factor to its “time-competiveness of using transit instead of a car in the city.” A-P Hurd, The Carbon-Efficient City.  According to Anthony Downs, author of Still Stuck in Traffic, he addresses the issue of congestion as not “itself the problem-in fact, congestion is the only feasible solution to this more basic problem.”  While a carbon tax may not be enough to motivate our real-narrative to align with our ideal narrative on our approach to T.O.D., traffic and congestion will offset convenience and begin to shift expectations. Congestion Pricing should be evaluated more.  Seattle area’s HOV smart lane on Highway 167 is a form of Congestion Pricing and while critics of congestion pricing argue that it is expensive to administer, and does not really reduce congestion in any case, If we make alternative transportations modes cheaper than the fee for congestion, it becomes a win-win.



One thought on “TOD isn’t Convenient, Until It Is

  1. Just an FYI, if you are full time student and have the new student ID, it’s a upass (which you pay for since it’s built into your tuition) it will also work for the light rail, so the ride may actually be free for you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s